Technical Bulletin Volume 31, 2010
Sir Joshua Reynolds’s portrait of Lord Heathfield (NG 111) was commissioned to commemorate the sitter’s defence of Gibraltar and his triumphant defeat of the Spanish siege. It was painted in 1787 towards the end of the artist’s career, by which time Reynolds had achieved wealth, success and a considerable degree of celebrity.
However, the painting began to deteriorate early in its life and it now suffers from the severe cracking and pronounced drying defects typical of so many of Reynolds’s works. The portrait was recently examined in the conservation studio and the results of the analytical and technical study are reported in this article, set in the context of the documentary sources relating to Reynolds’s painting techniques.
The use of a resin-containing binding medium such as megilp is discussed as a possible cause of the drying cracks and Reynolds’s use of varnish-like glaze layers is investigated. An improved understanding of the methods employed by Reynolds to create the portrait informed the assessment of the painting’s condition and appearance and was critical for evaluating suitable conservation treatment.
Sir Joshua Reynolds (1723–1792), Lord Heathfield, painting techniques, paint-binding medium, megilp, glaze, varnish, mastic, organic analysis, GC–MS, lead-tin-antimony yellow
To cite this article we suggest using
Morrison, R., 2010. 'Mastic and Megilp in Reynolds’s "Lord Heathfield of Gibraltar"'. National Gallery Technical Bulletin Vol 31, pp 112–128.
Problems opening files? Get Adobe Reader [External link]