Skip to main content

Picasso Ingres: Face to Face

Issued February 2022

3 June – 9 October 2022
Room 46
Admission free

‘Lesser artists borrow; great artists steal.’ *
‘Les bons artistes copient, les grands artistes volent.’ * Pablo Picasso

For the first time ever a painting by Pablo Picasso ('Woman with a Book', 1932) from the Norton Simon Museum in Pasadena, California, and the painting by Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres ('Madame Moitessier', 1856) which famously inspired it, will be shown side by side at the National Gallery, London as part of a special collaboration between the two museums.

Image: Left: Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres, 'Madame Moitessier', 1856 © The National Gallery, London / Right: Pablo Picasso, 'Woman with a Book', 1932. The Norton Simon Foundation © Succession Picasso/DACS 2021 / photo The Norton Simon Foundation

Picasso admired Ingres and referred to him throughout his career. Picasso’s affinity with Ingres can clearly be seen not only in painting but also extensively in his drawings and studies during his ‘neoclassical’ phase in the 1920s. In 1921 Picasso was working in Paris and was in the process of reinventing his art after Cubism. He encountered Ingres’s 'Madame Moitessier' in an exhibition that year and was so enthralled by this portrait that it remained lodged in his memory and 11 years later in 1932, he painted 'Woman with a Book'. The latter is one of his most celebrated likenesses of his young mistress Marie-Thérèse Walter (1909 – 1977), whom he had met in 1927 - while still married to his wife, the Russian ballet dancer Olga Khokhlova (1891 – 1955). 'Woman with a Book' balances freedom and restraint, and echoes 'Madame Moitessier' in significant ways: his model’s hand touching the temple is a direct quotation, while the flowers on her sleeves evoke Madame Moitessier’s dress. By replacing Madame Moitessier’s fan with an open book, Picasso evoked the suggestive sensuality latent beneath Ingres’s image of bourgeois respectability. The serene profile reflected in a mirror to the right in Picasso’s portrait likewise references the earlier painting but may also constitute an abstract self portrait.

Wearing her finest clothes and jewellery, Madame Moitessier (1821–1897) gazes majestically at us. She is the embodiment of luxury and style during the Second Empire, which saw the restoration of the French imperial throne and extravagant displays of wealth. The room has the ambiance of a luxurious 18th-century salon with its Japanese Imari vase, silk handscreen, ornate fan, Louis XV console table, gilded mirror frame and padded damask sofa (with a tiny cupid peeking over Madame Moitessier’s left shoulder). Her distinctive pose is based on an ancient fresco from Herculaneum depicting the goddess of Arcadia, that Ingres may have seen in Naples in 1814. In the portrait, he uses the gesture of Arcadia’s right hand, with its index finger raised, supporting her head. Ingres owned engravings of the mural and preparatory drawings show how he gave great attention to the precise positioning of Madame Moitessier’s right arm, hand and fingers. Indeed, for Ingres, Madame Moitessier was a living embodiment of the Classical ideal. A modern-day goddess enthroned in luxury, she sits impassively, fully confident of her place in society.

The portrait was commissioned in 1844 to celebrate the marriage two years earlier of Marie Clotilde-Inès de Foucauld to the wealthy merchant, Sigisbert Moitessier. Ingres was initially reluctant to accept the commission but changed his mind after meeting the 23-year-old Madame Moitessier, whom he described as ‘beautiful and good’. Art critic Théophile Gautier, who was present during some of the painting sessions, agreed with Ingres, describing her beauty as the most regal, magnificent, stately and Junoesque that he had ever seen drawn.

It took Ingres 12 years to complete the painting. During this time, the picture underwent several major revisions: a young daughter, Catherine, was originally included but was removed from the composition, and at the last moment, in 1855, a different dress was chosen to reflect a change in fashion. The yellow dress Madame Moitessier was initially wearing was changed to a dress of fashionable and expensive Lyon silk printed with a floral pattern, which is echoed by the flowers and leaves of the extravagant gilt frame, designed by Ingres himself.

Her reflection in the mirror was a startling invention to show a different side of her, but closer inspection of the mirror reveals some oddities. The reflection is not entirely consistent with her actual position. It also lacks the detail and luminosity of the figure, its dull surface contrasting with the opulence of Madame Moitessier and her surroundings. This complex and ambiguous invention suggesting simultaneous points of view would have an impact in the 20th century, and not only on Picasso.

This exhibition is an opportunity to explore Picasso’s enduring affinity with Ingres, and his ability to reference or ‘steal’ previous artist’s work which he famously acknowledged when he said: ‘Lesser artists borrow; great artists steal.’* It will provide visitors with a unique opportunity to compare the two works and to engage with these masterpieces in a different way.

Christopher Riopelle, the National Gallery’s Neil Westreich Curator of Post-1800 Paintings, says:

‘Picasso was a passionate student of European painting with a voracious memory for images. He constantly pitted himself against the masters he most admired, among them Ingres. Beguiled by the voluptuous Marie-Thérèse Walter, for Picasso 1932 was one of the most inventive and productive years of his long career. Perhaps it is no surprise that the memory of Ingres’s opulent, regal and strange 'Madame Moitessier', wondered at in an exhibition eleven years earlier, should so powerfully impose itself anew on Picasso’s imagination.’

National Gallery Director, Dr Gabriele Finaldi, says:

‘I am delighted that our exceptional collaboration with the Norton Simon Museum brings together Ingres and Picasso in a face off that demonstrates the ongoing dialogue between artists of different times. Picasso makes us look again at Ingres, and Ingres helps us to understand Picasso.’

Exhibition organised by the National Gallery, London and the Norton Simon Museum of Art at Pasadena. Following its display in London, the exhibition will be on view at the Norton Simon Museum of Art 21 October 2022– 30 January 2023.

More information at
Twitter @nationalgallery
Facebook @thenationalgallery
Instagram #nationalgallery
YouTube The National Gallery

The H J Hyams Exhibition Programme

Supported by The Capricorn Foundation

Notes to Editors 

* ‘Steal’ is the word Picasso himself is widely reported to have used to describe what great artists do, while good artists merely borrow. There are, however, many candidates for the inventor of this famous expression.


Pablo Picasso, Woman with a Book, 1932
Oil on canvas, 130.5 x 97.8 cm
The Norton Simon Foundation
© Succession Picasso/DACS 2021 / photo The Norton Simon Foundation

Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres, Madame Moitessier, 1856
Oil on canvas, 120 x 92.1 cm
© The National Gallery, London

Press View: Wednesday 1 June 2022

Title: Picasso Ingres: Face to Face
Authors: Christopher Riopelle, Emily Talbot and Susan L. Siegfried
72 pages, 52 illustrations, 270 x 230 mm, portrait
Paperback with flaps: £14.95, special Gallery price: £12.95
Published by National Gallery Company Ltd. Distributed by Yale University Press

Pablo Picasso (1881–1973)
Arguably the most famous and most influential artist of the 20th century, Picasso was born in Málaga, Spain and received encouragement from his father, who was an artist and teacher.

After a period in Barcelona, he moved to Paris in 1904. The early paintings of his so-called blue period changed to paintings in tones of pink and grey. His interest in primitive art culminated in the painting The Demoiselles d'Avignon (1906/7, Museum of Modern Art, New York). Semi-abstract painting in the form of 'Analytical Cubism' was developed by Picasso and Braque in the years 1910–12, followed by the less severe works of 'Synthetic Cubism' including Fruit Dish, Bottle and Violin in 1912–16.

Classical art became an increasingly important influence on Picasso's art following a visit to Rome in 1917. His later years, which showed no abatement in his production of painting and graphic art, sculpture and pottery, were spent mainly in the South of France.

Picasso was married twice and had four children, Paulo, Maya, Claude and Paloma by three women. He died on 8 April 1973 in Mougins, France, while he and his wife Jacqueline entertained friends for dinner. He was interred at the Chateau of Vauvenargues near Aix-en-Provence, a property he had acquired in 1958.

Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres (1780–1867)
Ingres was steeped in the academic tradition, which centred on study from the nude and Classical art. He became the defender of a rigid Classicism which contrasted with the Romanticism of Delacroix.

Ingres saw himself as a history painter, the highest goal of academic art. Portraiture he thought of less importance, but he is now most famous for works like Madame Moitessier as well for his escapist scenes of the Orient.

Ingres came to national prominence as a pupil of Jacques-Louis David and as a student at the École des Beaux-Arts, Paris. He won a scholarship to Rome in 1801 which he took up in 1806, partly because of an unfavourable reception at the Paris Salon.

Under the influence of Italian art (particularly Raphael) he mastered portraiture. He also painted small pictures illustrating literary texts, scenes from French history or the lives of artists, which were sold to the French crown. He returned to France, where he became Director of the French Academy. Ingres was also an accomplished violinist who could have had a successful career as a musician: the French phrase for having a second string to one's bow is a 'violon d'Ingres'.

Publicity images can be obtained from

For more information and images: 
E-mail National Gallery Press Office at