The Roman Campagna, with the Claudian Aqueduct
A. Robaut, L’Oeuvre de Corot. Catalogue raisonné et illustré précédé de l’Histoire de Corot et de ses oeuvres par Étienne Moreau-Nélaton, ornée de dessins et croquis originaux du maître, 4 vols, Paris 1905, II, p. 38, no. 98 bis
Martin Davies (revised by Cecil Gould), National Gallery Catalogues: French School: Early 19th Century, Impressionists, Post-Impressionists etc, London 1970, pp. 32–3
A. and R. Jullien, ‘Corot dans les castelli Romani’, Gazette des Beaux-Arts, 129, 1987, pp. 109–30 (113)
P.-K. Schuster, Carl Blechen: Zwischen Romantik und Realismus, exh. cat. Nationalgalerie, Berlin 1990, no. 375
M. Clarke, ‘Degas and Corot: The affinity between two artists’ artists’, Apollo, July 1991, pp. 15–20; P. Galassi, Corot in Italy. Open-Air Painting and the Classical-Landscape Tradition, New Haven and London 1991, pp. 170–2
D. Saunders, H. Chahine and J. Cupitt, ‘Long-term Colour Change Measurement: Some Results after Twenty Years’, National Gallery Technical Bulletin, 17, 1996, pp. 81–90 (85–7)
P. Conisbee, S. Faunce, J. Strick and P. Galassi, In the Light of Italy. Corot and Early Open-Air Painting, exh. cat., Washington 1996–7, no. 88
A. Dumas, G. Tinterow et al., The Private Collection of Edgar Degas, exh. cat., Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 1997–8, esp. pp. 3ff, 122 and 293ff
R. White, J. Pilc and J. Kirby, ‘Analyses of Paint Media’, National Gallery Technical Bulletin, 19, 1998, pp. 79–94 (83 and 90)
1. Bibliothèque Nationale de France, Cabinet des Estampes, Alfred Robaut, Documents sur Corot, 4oY b 3 949 I p. 36. Quoted in A. Roquebert, ‘Quelques observations sur la technique de Corot’, in Corot, un artiste et son temps. Actes des colloques organisés au Musée du Louvre par le Service Culturel les 1er et 2 mars 1996 à Paris et par l’Académie de France à Rome, Villa Médicis, le 9 mars 1996 à Rome, Paris and Rome 1998, pp. 73–97 (79).
2. For a full discussion of materials and technique see article by S. Herring, ‘Six Paintings by Corot in the National Gallery: Methods, Materials and Sources’, National Gallery Technical Bulletin, 30, 2009.
3. L.N. Vauquelin, ‘Second Memoir on the Metal Contained in the Red Lead of Siberia’, Philosophical Magazine, I, 1798, pp. 361–7, and ‘Mémoire sur la meilleure méthode pour decomposer le chromate de fer, obtenir l’oxydé de chrome, préparer l’acide chromique, et sur quelques combinaisons de ce dernier’, Annales de Chimie, 1st ser. 70, 1809, pp. 70–94. See R. Newman in E.W. Fitzhugh, ed., Artists’ Pigments. A Handbook of Their History and Characteristics, Washington DC and Oxford 1997, pp. 273–93. Newman does not go into the question of the date of its introduction.
4.A.H. Church, The Chemistry of Paints and Painting, London, 3rd edn, 1901, pp. 194–5. See also R.J. Gettens and G.L. Stout, Painting Materials. A Short Encyclopedia, New York 1942, pp. 173–4.
5. Gettens and Stout 1942, pp. 173–4. In England the colour maker George Field was also making the colour, and his journal entry for 1815 gives a recipe for chromium oxide. Most assume that the green supplied by Field from 1815 was of the opaque variety, but this cannot be certain, as he did not make any chemical distinction between the opaque and transparent green. In his Chromatography, an account of pigments available at the time, he talks of a true chrome green, ‘of various degrees of transparency or opacity’. G. Field, Chromatography. A Treatise on Colours and Pigments, London 1835, p. 129.
6. The reference in Arsenne is noted in D. Bomford, J. Kirby, J. Leighton and A. Roy, Art in the Making. Impressionism, exh. cat., London 1990–1, p. 219, and A. Burmester and C. Denk, ‘Blau, Gelb, Grün und die Landschaftsmalerei von Barbizon’, Barbizon. Malerei der Natur – Natur der Malerei, eds A. Burmester, C. Heilmann and M.F. Zimmermann, Munich 1999, pp. 295–329 (298).
7. L.-C. Arsenne, Manuel du Peintre et du Sculpteur, 2 vols, Paris 1833, II, p. 248. However, J.-F.-L. Mérimée, De la peinture à huile, Paris 1830, p. 190, only mentions the opaque variety of the green, not true viridian, which suggests that he was unaware of it.
8. Moreau-Nélaton in Robaut 1905, I, p. 24. See Burmester and Denk 1999, p. 307.
9. Moreau-Nélaton in Robaut 1905, I, pp. 38ff. See Burmester and Denk 1999, p. 298.
10. Alfred Robaut, Documents sur Corot, Bibliothèque Nationale de France, Cabinet des Estampes, Yb3 949, II, p. 15. Quoted in Roquebert 1998, p. 90. While acknowledging that on occasion Corot did make use of certain greens, for example vert Veronèse and vert éméraude, Roquebert repeats this in her essay ‘La technique de Corot’ in Madrid/Ferrara 2005–6, pp. 57–71, French translation, pp. 343–7, Italian edn, pp. 59–71, esp. pp. 66–7. In both essays she cites the findings of J.- P. Rioux that Corot hardly ever used ready-made greens, backed up by R. Woudhuysen-Keller, J. Cuttle and Ch. Hurst, ‘Zwei Gemälde von Camille Corot. Gedanken zur Maltechnik und zur Restaurierung’, Restauro, 1993, no. 3, pp. 306–15.
11. See Burmester and Denk 1999, p. 302.
12. Two later paintings in the collection where viridian has been found are NG 6439, Peasants under the Trees at Dawn, and NG 6466, The Oak in the Valley, both of which are discussed below. At the same time Corot also created greens using a mixture of Prussian blue and chrome yellow, as in NG 2625, The Leaning Tree Trunk.
13. Corot returned to France via Venice. He was again in Italy in May – October 1834, and May – August 1843.
14. Baehr made two further trips to Rome, in 1827–8 and 1834–5. There exists from the last trip a painting, Campagna Landscape, which also shows the aqueducts (Dresden, Gemäldegalerie Neue Meister, no. 2698).
15. See Jullien 1987, pp. 112–13, for a discussion of the view.
16. See T. Ashby, The Aqueducts of Ancient Rome, ed. I. A. Richmond, Oxford 1935, p. 232.
17. In this view he is situated four kilometres from the Porta San Giovanni.
18. In this latter they are viewed from next to the tomb of Cecilia Metella. See P. Galassi, Corot in Italy, 1825–8, PhD thesis, Columbia University, 1986, p. 419, where he links R96 with R101 and R180, stating that two of them are copies of the third, but as he has not been to able to study them at first hand, is not able to say which is the original.
19. Christie’s, London, 2 July 2008, lot 175. It is to be included in the sixth supplement to Robaut, which is in preparation.
20. Galassi 1991, p. 157.
21. Galassi 1991, pp. 170–2.
22. It does not have, as Jullien suggested, a golden evening light.
23. The compiler is grateful to Claire Bechu, Centre Historique des Archives Nationales, Paris, for this suggestion. Martin Davies identified Saint-Barbe as the Collège Sainte-Barbe in Paris, but was not able to find mention of Panis in either J. Quicherat, Histoire de Sainte-Barbe, Collège etc, Paris 1860/4, or in the Almanach Royal for that period. He is also not mentioned in E. Nouvel, Le Collège Sainte-Barbe: la vie d’un collège parisien de Charles VII à nos jours, Paris 1948. There is no mention of Panis among the college’s archives in the Sorbonne, which in fact date mostly from before the Revolution. The compiler is grateful to Jacqueline Artier, conservateur du service du livre ancien, Bibliothèque de la Sorbonne, for checking this.
24. R3103, carnet 66, vers 1825.
25. Collection de M. Le Comte Armand Doria. Tome Premier, tableaux modernes. Préface et Catalogue analytique par M.L. Roger-Milès. Précédés d’un essai sur la Vie du Comte Armand Doria par M. Arsène Alexandre, Paris, Imprimerie Georges Petit, 1899. If indeed Corot simply lent the painting to Panis, then it would be plausible to suggest that Count Armand Doria, who was an important collector of Barbizon and Impressionist pictures and who invited artists to stay with him, bought this painting directly from Corot. Degas paid 1,150 francs for this painting. Information from L’Album Souvenir of the collection, which appeared a few months after the sale, conveyed by Comte Arnauld Doria in a letter of 20 April 1956 in the dossier. The National Gallery Library also holds an Album Souvenir, which records the price as 1,820 francs.
26. NG 3285 was one of seven paintings by Corot in Degas’s collection, six of which were landscapes, the seventh being a figure study of a woman. Although Degas was not alone in collecting Corots at this period, it was unusual to concentrate, as he did, on the artist’s early work. It has been noted that Degas might have been attracted to Corot’s Italian scenes because of their reminder of Degas’s own time in Italy in the 1850s, from where he wrote: ‘A feeling of antiquity survives in the countryside, that is wild, empty, cursed like the desert, with its great mountains carrying aqueducts and its herds of cattle spread far and wide. This is really beautiful, with the kind of beauty that is like a dream of antiquity.’ Quoted in A. Dumas, Degas as a Collector, exh. cat., National Gallery, London 1996, p. 36. It is probable that it was one of the `two small Views of Italy by Corot’ which hung in Degas’s bedroom. See P. Lafond, Degas, Paris 1918, pp. 177–21. Holmes writes that it was ‘the vivid little early landscape by Corot, which Degas kept hanging over his bed’. C.J. Holmes, Self and Partners (Mostly Self), London 1936, p. 338.
For the Degas collection and sales see London 1996, p. 36; New York 1997–8, Holmes 1936, pp. 336–42; D. Sutton, ‘The Degas Sales and England’, Burlington Magazine, April 1989, pp. 266–72; Anne Emberton, ‘Keynes and the Degas Sale’, History Today, January 1996, pp. 22–8. NG 3285 does not seem to have been considered the most important work by Corot in the collection, as The Limay Bridge was singled out by more commentators on the sale. However, Bouyer gives it this praise: ‘As for the Ruins of the Claudian Aqueduct, its pink patches in the harsh Roman countryside rendered in unusual greens, it is one of those loyal nature studies that justify Poussin’s bluish backgrounds and vast cloudy skies.’ See R. Bouyer, ‘Mouvement des arts: la Collection Edgar Degas’, La Chronique des Arts, March 1918, pp. 85–7, reprinted in Dumas, Tinterow et al., 1997–8, pp. 310–12.